Rigorous methodology, coding-only scope
Codility's I/O-psychologist-validated tasks earn trust in regulated hiring — but stay coding-focused. H-Evaluate generates across five pillars, technical and non-technical.
H-Evaluate vs Codility
The Codility alternative that generates beyond coding
Codility brings a validated, auditable methodology and a real VS Code interview environment to technical hiring. H-Evaluate generates a fresh assessment per job across five pillars, rather than drawing from a fixed coding-task library.
A curated library versus per-job generation
Codility curates 1,300+ static tasks across 80+ languages. H-Evaluate builds questions from your job description, so no shared task set circulates to answer sites.
A named quality gate on every question
Codility leans on its plagiarism and monitoring stack. H-Evaluate adds a quality gate — every generated question passes it — plus an integrity engine, in six languages.
You control what each role is tested on
Toggle scored pillars, set language and AI-fluency levels, tune proctoring and gate thresholds, and let smart weightage calibrate the rest — per job, from one place. A test library can't do this.
Assessment configuration
Scored pillars · minimum 2 enabled
BehaviouralSituationalCognitiveDomainAI Sandbox· add-on
Gates & levels
AI fluency · Intermediate+Language · English · CEFR B2
Per role you can require other frameworks too — JLPT (N3–N1), TOPIK or DELF.
Proctoring & fraud
Proctoring · camera · mic · fullscreenAI-answer detectionFlag for review · risk ≥ 0.7
Consent-gated and plan-tiered — nothing is auto-rejected without a human in the loop.
Gate decision
Advance · score ≥ 65Soft knock-out · reviewHard knock-out · score < 40
A failed language gate or compliance-critical miss is a hard knock-out before scoring even starts.
Smart weightage
autoDomain
28%
Cognitive
20%
Behavioural
20%
Situational
18%
AI Sandbox
14%
Weights auto-computed over the enabled pillars, calibrated to role and seniority — or set them by hand.
Control exactly what each role is tested on — pillars, gates, proctoring and smart weightage.
The honest verdict
Choose H-Evaluate if…
- You want questions generated for YOUR job, not shared content candidates can practice
- AI-era skills matter — you need to test how candidates work with AI, not just recall
- You hire across languages (JA/AR/KO/ES/FR) or need hard language gates
Codility
- You need a validated, auditable methodology for regulated hiring
- A real VS Code live-interview environment matters to your process
- Coding-only assessment covers the roles you screen for
Two pricing philosophies
H-Evaluate: job-based. Generation is metered per role; invite your full pipeline without counting candidate credits.
Codility: published invite-based plans (as published July 2026) — Starter about $1,200/year for 120 invites, Scale around $500/month for 300 invites a year; Enterprise is custom. Priced per invite rather than per seat.
How H-Evaluate compares
Feature-for-feature against the platforms recruiters know.
| H-Evaluate | TestGorilla | Bryq | Testlify | Vervoe | HireVue | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI-generated questions | Yes | Library only | Library only | Library only | Library only | Library only |
| AI Sandbox | Yes | No | Basic MCQ only | No | No | No |
| SURE structured retry | Yes | No | No | No | No | No |
| Hard language gate | Yes | No | No | Score only | No | No |
| Pillar weight lock | Yes | No | No | No | No | No |
| Per-job pillar & gate control | Yes | No | No | No | No | No |
| Recruiter generation brief | Yes | No | No | No | No | No |
| Automated question quality gate | Yes | No | No | No | No | No |
| Quality-of-Hire tracking | Yes | No | No | Higher tier only | No | No |
| Native ATS integrations | Coming soon | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Feature and pricing points from vendors' public pages, July 2026. Spot an error? Tell us: [email protected]
Switching questions
Can I migrate from Codility?
There's nothing to migrate — H-Evaluate generates assessments from your job descriptions, not from imported test banks. Paste your JDs and your assessments exist within minutes.
Is AI-generated as reliable as a validated library?
Every generated question passes structural validation plus an independent AI judge before candidates see it, and quality-of-hire tracking validates predictions against real outcomes.
What does H-Evaluate cost?
Early-access pricing is being finalised around job slots (not candidate credits). Join the waitlist and we'll walk you through it.
Also compare: TestGorilla · Testlify · Vervoe · Bryq · HackerRank · iMocha · CodeSignal
See the difference on your own job description
Join the early-access waitlist and watch H-Evaluate build an assessment for a real role — yours.