3,500 tests — all shared
Every library test is taken by thousands of companies' candidates and leaks to answer sites. Generated questions have no answer key to find.
H-Evaluate vs Testlify
Testlify sells a 3,500-test shared library metered by annual credits. H-Evaluate generates a fresh assessment from your job description — and never counts candidate credits.
Every library test is taken by thousands of companies' candidates and leaks to answer sites. Generated questions have no answer key to find.
Testlify Premium runs ≈$8,392/year for 1,000 assessments with $3–5 overages. Screening your whole pipeline shouldn't be a budget decision.
Every H-Evaluate question passes structural checks plus an independent AI judge — with the verdict stored on the question. No library publishes its QA.
Toggle scored pillars, set language and AI-fluency levels, tune proctoring and gate thresholds, and let smart weightage calibrate the rest — per job, from one place. A test library can't do this.
Assessment configuration
Scored pillars · minimum 2 enabled
Gates & levels
Per role you can require other frameworks too — JLPT (N3–N1), TOPIK or DELF.
Proctoring & fraud
Consent-gated and plan-tiered — nothing is auto-rejected without a human in the loop.
Gate decision
A failed language gate or compliance-critical miss is a hard knock-out before scoring even starts.
Smart weightage
autoWeights auto-computed over the enabled pillars, calibrated to role and seniority — or set them by hand.
Control exactly what each role is tested on — pillars, gates, proctoring and smart weightage.
H-Evaluate: job-based. Generation is metered per role; invite your full pipeline without counting candidate credits.
Testlify: annual credits — Premium ≈ $8,392/year for 1,000 assessments, $3–5 per overage; unlimited requires a ~$75k plan.
Feature-for-feature against the platforms recruiters know.
| H-Evaluate | TestGorilla | Bryq | Testlify | Vervoe | HireVue | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI-generated questions | Yes | Library only | Library only | Library only | Library only | Library only |
| AI Sandbox | Yes | No | Basic MCQ only | No | No | No |
| SURE structured retry | Yes | No | No | No | No | No |
| Hard language gate | Yes | No | No | Score only | No | No |
| Pillar weight lock | Yes | No | No | No | No | No |
| Per-job pillar & gate control | Yes | No | No | No | No | No |
| Recruiter generation brief | Yes | No | No | No | No | No |
| Automated question quality gate | Yes | No | No | No | No | No |
| Quality-of-Hire tracking | Yes | No | No | Higher tier only | No | No |
| Native ATS integrations | Coming soon | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Feature and pricing points from vendors' public pages, July 2026. Spot an error? Tell us: [email protected]
There's nothing to migrate — H-Evaluate generates assessments from your job descriptions, not from imported test banks. Paste your JDs and your assessments exist within minutes.
Every generated question passes structural validation plus an independent AI judge before candidates see it, and quality-of-hire tracking validates predictions against real outcomes.
Early-access pricing is being finalised around job slots (not candidate credits). Join the waitlist and we'll walk you through it.
Also compare: TestGorilla · Vervoe · Bryq
Join the early-access waitlist and watch H-Evaluate build an assessment for a real role — yours.
See the difference on your own job description